Attitude, Acceptability, and Perceived Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Quantitative Cross-sectional Study among Future Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62486/latia2025313Keywords:
Attitude, Acceptability, Artificial Intelligence, Effectiveness, EducationAbstract
This study investigated the extent of prospective teachers’ acceptance, attitudes, and perceived effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in education. It also examined whether these perceptions varied according to gender and age group. Using a descriptive-correlational design, data were gathered from 392 teacher education students enrolled in a state-managed university in southwestern Mindanao. The results revealed that the respondents generally demonstrated moderate acceptance, favorable attitudes, and positive perceptions of AI effectiveness in the teaching and learning process. While no statistically significant differences were found between genders, moderate effect sizes suggested subtle variations worth further exploration. Significant differences were observed across age groups, with older individuals reporting higher levels of AI acceptance. Strong and significant correlations among acceptance, attitude, and perceived effectiveness affirmed the interconnected nature of belief, emotion, and evaluation in shaping readiness for AI integration. These findings support the Technology Acceptance Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior. In light of these results, it is recommended that teacher education programs integrate AI literacy and practical training, with targeted support for younger students to enhance digital confidence and preparedness.
References
Gruetzemacher R, Whittlestone J. The transformative potential of artificial intelligence. Futures. 2022; 135:102884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102884 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102884
Abichandani P, Iaboni C, Lobo D, Kelly T. Artificial intelligence and computer vision education: Codifying student learning gains and attitudes. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2023; 5:100159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100159
Marcus G, Davis E. Rebooting AI: Building artificial intelligence we can trust. New York: Vintage; 2019.
Agarwal V, Verma P, Ferrigno G. Education 5.0 challenges and sustainable development goals in emerging economies: A mixed-method approach. Technol Soc. 2025; 81:102814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102814
Ayanwale MA, Owolabi PA, Molefi RR, Adeeko O, Ishola AM. Examining artificial intelligence literacy among pre-service teachers for future classrooms. Comput Educ Open. 2024; 6:100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100179
du Boulay B. Artificial intelligence as an effective classroom assistant. IEEE Intell Syst. 2016; 31:76–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2016.93 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2016.93
Mohd Amin MR, Ismail I, Sivakumaran VM. Revolutionizing education with artificial intelligence (AI)? Challenges and implications for open and distance learning (ODL). Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2025; 11:101308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101308
Ayanwale MA, Sanusi IT, Adelana OP, Aruleba KD, Oyelere SS. Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2022; 3:100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099
Celik I, Dindar M, Muukkonen H, Järvelä S. The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for educators: A systematic review of research. TechTrends. 2022;66(4):616–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y
Galindo-Domínguez H, Delgado H, Campo L, Losada D. Relationship between teachers’ digital competence and attitudes towards artificial intelligence in education. Int J Educ Res. 2024; 126:102381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102381
Chatterjee S, Bhattacharjee KK. Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: A quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Educ Inf Technol. 2020; 25:3443–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10159-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10159-7
Zawacki-Richter O, Marín VI, Bond M, Gouverneur F. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2019;16:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhai X, Chu X, Chai CS, Jong MSY, Istenic A, Spector M, et al. A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity. 2021;2021:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542
Zhang K, Aslan AB. AI technologies for education: Recent research and future directions. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2021;2:100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025
Li S, Liu B. Joseph E. Aoun: Robot-proof: Higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. High Educ. 2019; 77:757–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0289-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0289-3
Haseski HI. What do Turkish pre-service teachers think about artificial intelligence? Int J Comput Sci Educ Sch. 2019;3(2):3–23. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v3i2.55 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v3i2.55
Bond M, Khosravi H, De Laat M, Bergdahl N, Negrea V, Oxley E, et al. A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2024; 21:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z
Awad E, Dsouza S, Kim R, Schulz J, Henrich J, Shariff A, et al. The moral machine experiment. Nature. 2018;563(7729):59–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6
Liehner GL, Brauner P, Schaar AK, Ziefle M. Delegation of moral tasks to automated agents—The impact of risk and context on trusting a machine to perform a task. IEEE Trans Technol Soc. 2021;3(1):46–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2021.3118355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TTS.2021.3118355
Humble N, Mozelius P. The threat, hype, and promise of artificial intelligence in education. Discov Artif Intell. 2022;2:22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00039-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-022-00039-z
Chiu TKF, Xia Q, Zhou X, Chai CS, Cheng M. Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2023;4:100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
Brauner P, Hick A, Philipsen R, Ziefle M. What does the public think about artificial intelligence? A criticality map to understand bias in the public perception of AI. Front Comput Sci. 2023;5:1113903. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1113903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1113903
Kreps S, George J, Lushenko P, Rao A. Exploring the artificial intelligence “trust paradox”: Evidence from a survey experiment in the United States. PLoS One. 2023;18(7):e0288109. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288109
Eitel-Porter R. Beyond the promise: Implementing ethical AI. AI Ethics. 2021;1:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00011-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00011-6
Asio JM, Soriano ID. The state of artificial intelligence (AI) use in higher education institutions (HEIs) in the Philippines. In: Mobo F, editor. Impacts of AI on Students and Teachers in Education 5.0. IGI Global Scientific Publishing; 2025. p. 523–52. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8191-5.ch019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8191-5.ch019
Funa A, Gabay RA. Policy guidelines and recommendations on AI use in teaching and learning: A meta synthesis study. Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2025;11:101221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101221
Alieto EO, Abequibel-Encarnacion A, Estigoy E, Balasa K, Eijansantos A, Torres-Toukoumidis A. Teaching inside a digital classroom: A quantitative analysis of attitude, technological competence and access among teachers across subject disciplines. Heliyon. 2024;10(2):e24282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24282
Bagares U, Alieto E, Buslon J, Somblingo R, Cabangcala R. Perceptions of Filipino preservice teachers toward the quality of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. In: Motahhir S, Bossoufi B, editors. Digital Technologies and Applications. ICDTA 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Cham: Springer; 2023. p. 421–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29860-8_43
Berganio ME, Tanpoco M, Dumagay AH. Preservice teachers’ perceived level of digital literacy: A quantitative study from a developing country. In: Motahhir S, Bossoufi B, editors. ICDTA 2024. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 1101. Cham: Springer; 2024. p. 158–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68675-7_16
Clorion FD, Fuentes JO, Suicano DJ, Estigoy E, Serdenia JR, Alejandrino P, et al. Smartphones and syntax: A quantitative study on harnessing the role of mobile-assisted language learning in the digital classroom and applications for language learning. Procedia Comput Sci. 2025;257:7–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.03.004
Fernandez MA, Cabangcala C, Fanilag E, Cabangcala R, Balasa K, Alieto EO. Technology in education: An attitudinal investigation among prospective teachers from a country of emerging economy. In: Farhaoui Y, Hussain A, Saba T, Taherdoost H, Verma A, editors. Artificial Intelligence, Data Science and Applications. ICAISE 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 837. Cham: Springer; 2024. p. 248–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48465-0_33
Flores B, Amabao K, Aidil-Karanain F, Dumagay AH. Bachelor of Culture and Arts student’s attitude toward using digital games for learning. Sci Int (Lahore). 2023;35(3):357–61.
Gonzales LI, Yusoo RJ, Miñoza M, Casimiro A, Devanadera A, Dumagay AH. Reading in the 21st century: Digital reading habit of prospective elementary language teachers. In: Farhaoui Y, Hussain A, Saba T, Taherdoost H, Verma A, editors. Artificial Intelligence, Data Science and Applications. ICAISE 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 837. Cham: Springer; 2024. p. 134–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48465-0_18
Gregorio TAD, Alieto EO, Natividad ERR, Tanpoco MR. Are preservice teachers “Totally PACKaged”? A quantitative study of preservice teachers’ knowledge and skills to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. In: Motahhir S, Bossoufi B, editors. Digital Technologies and Applications. ICDTA 2024. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 1100. Cham: Springer; 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68660-3_5
Tomaro QPV. ICT integration in the educational system of Philippines. J Gov Public Policy. 2018;5(3):259–82. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.5399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.5399
Balasa K, Dumagay AH, Alieto E, González Vallejo R. Gender and age dynamics in future educators’ attitudes toward AI integration in education: A sample from state-managed universities in Zamboanga Peninsula, Philippines. Semin Med Writ Educ. 2025;4:4668. https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025668 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025668
Bantoto FMO, Rillo R, Abequibel B, Mangila BB, Alieto EO. Is AI an effective “learning tool” in academic writing? Investigating the perceptions of third-year university students on the use of artificial intelligence in classroom instruction. In: International Conference on Digital Technologies and Applications. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2024. p. 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68650-4_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68650-4_8
Clorion FDD, Alieto E, Fuentes J, Suicano DJ, Natividad ER, Miñoza M, et al. Artificial intelligence in academic writing in higher education in a country of emerging economy: An analysis of knowledge, perceived influence, extent of use, and perception. In: Lahby M, Maleh Y, Bucchiarone A, Schaeffer SE, editors. General Aspects of Applying Generative AI in Higher Education. Cham: Springer; 2024. p. 301–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65691-0_16
Francisco CI, Pantaleon CE, Lantaya GMA, Francisco WAR, Alieto EO. Understanding the attitude of senior high school students toward utilizing ChatGPT as a learning tool: A quantitative analysis. In: Hamdan RK, editor. Sustainable Data Management. Studies in Big Data, vol. 171. Cham: Springer; 2025. p. 37–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-83911-5_4
Fuentes J, Clorion F, Abequibel B, Valerio A, Alieto EO. Understanding the attitude of teacher education students toward utilizing ChatGPT as a learning tool: A quantitative analysis. In: Motahhir S, Bossoufi B, editors. Digital Technologies and Applications. ICDTA 2024. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 1098. Cham: Springer; 2024. p. 82–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68650-4_9
Santos ZMB, Cadano KJ, Gyawali YP, Alieto EO, Clorion FD. Navigating between conditions and convictions: Investigating the influence of sociogeographical factors on interest and attitudes toward artificial intelligence among secondary school teachers. In: Motahhir S, Bossoufi B, editors. Digital Technologies and Applications. ICDTA 2024. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 1101. Cham: Springer; 2024. p. 168–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68675-7_17
Baker R. Using learning analytics in personalized learning. In: Handbook on Personalized Learning for States, Districts, and Schools. 2016. p. 165–74.
Luckin R, Holmes W, Griffiths M, Forcier B. Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. London: Pearson Education; 2016.
Bajaj R, Sharma V. Smart education with artificial intelligence-based determination of learning styles. Procedia Comput Sci. 2018;132:834–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.095
Holmes W, Bialik M, Fadel C. Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign; 2019.
Wilson J, Ahrendt C, Fudge E, Raiche A, Beard G, M C. Elementary teachers’ perceptions of automated feedback and automated scoring: Transforming the teaching and learning of writing using automated writing evaluation. Comput Educ. 2021;168:104208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104208
Chong T, Yu T, Keeling DI, de Ruyter K. AI-chatbots on the services frontline: Addressing the challenges and opportunities of agency. J Retail Consum Serv. 2021;63:102735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102735
Wang S, Wang F, Zhu Z, Wang J, Tran T, Du Z. Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Syst Appl. 2024;213:118591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167
Zheng L, Niu J, Zhong L, Gyasi JF. The effectiveness of artificial intelligence on learning achievement and learning perception: A meta-analysis. Interact Learn Environ. 2021;31(9):5650–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2015693 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2015693
Dakakmi D, Safa N. Artificial intelligence in the L2 classroom: Implications and challenges on ethics and equity in higher education: A 21st century Pandora’s box. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2023;5:100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100179
Font de la Valle RR, Araya FG. Exploring the benefits and challenges of AI-language learning tools. Int J Soc Sci Humanit Invention. 2023;10(1):7569–76. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v10i01.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v10i01.02
Wamba SF, Queiroz MM, Hamzi L. A bibliometric and multi-disciplinary quasi-systematic analysis of social robots: Past, future, and insights of human-robot interaction. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2023;197:122912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122912
Wang YY, Wang YS. Development and validation of an artificial intelligence anxiety scale: An initial application in predicting motivated learning behavior. Interact Learn Environ. 2022;30(4):619–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674887 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674887
Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Liao YK, Nguyen VHA, Yeong HY, Hong Vu VT, Trinh HT. Unraveling the effects of entrepreneurial passion and entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention: The moderating role of demographic characteristics. Glob Bus Organ Excell. 2023;42(6):34–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22190
Elom CO, Ayanwale MA, Ukeje IO, Offiah GA, Umoke CC, Ogbonnaya CE. Does AI knowledge encourage cheating? Investigating student perceptions, ethical engagement, and academic integrity in the digital age. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res. 2025;24(4). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.4.33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.4.33
Sethi SS, Jain K. AI technologies for social emotional learning: Recent research and future directions. J Res Innov Teach Learn. 2024;17(2):213–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-03-2024-0073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-03-2024-0073
Roshanaei M. Toward best practices for mitigating artificial intelligence implicit bias in shaping diversity, inclusion and equity in higher education. Educ Inf Technol. 2024;29(14):18959–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12605-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12605-2
Brandhofer G, Tengler K. Acceptance of artificial intelligence in education: Opportunities, concerns and need for action. Adv Mob Learn Educ Res. 2024;4(2):1105–13. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.02.005
Vashishth TK, Sharma V, Sharma KK, Kumar B, Panwar R, Chaudhary S. AI-driven learning analytics for personalized feedback and assessment in higher education. In: Using Traditional Design Methods to Enhance AI-Driven Decision Making. IGI Global Scientific Publishing; 2024. p. 206–30. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0639-0.ch009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0639-0.ch009
Alampay EA, Capule-Navarro MT. Provision of electricity and internet access in DepEd schools: Implications on school performance and digital inclusivity in the new normal. Philipp J Public Policy. 2023;36–63.
Costan E, Gonzales G, Gonzales R, Enriquez L, Costan F, Suladay D, et al. Education 4.0 in developing economies: A systematic literature review of implementation barriers and future research agenda. Sustainability. 2021;13(22):12763. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212763
World Bank. Digital transformation of Philippine higher education [Internet]. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2022 [cited 2025 Jun 17]. Available from: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099925001062333685/pdf/P17757402843a10c90b3e30308406a38304.pdf
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Brandhofer G, Tengler K. On the acceptance of AI applications among teachers and teacher trainees. R&ESOURCE—Open Online Journal for Research and Education. 2024;11(3):7–25. https://doi.org/10.53349/resource.2024.i3.a1277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53349/resource.2024.i3.a1277
Molefi RR, Ayanwale MA, Kurata L, Chere-Masopha J. Do in-service teachers accept artificial intelligence-driven technology? The mediating role of school support and resources. Comput Educ Open. 2024;6:100191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100191
Bergdahl N, Sjöberg J. Attitudes, perceptions and AI self-efficacy in K-12 education. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2025;8:100358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100358
Holmes W, Porayska-Pomsta K, editors. The ethics of artificial intelligence in education: Practices, challenges, and debates. London: Taylor & Francis; 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429329067
Wirtz BW, Weyerer JC, Geyer C. Artificial intelligence and the public sector—applications and challenges. Int J Public Adm. 2019;42(7):596–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103
Zhang C, Schießl J, Plößl L, Hofmann F, Gläser-Zikuda M. Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: a multigroup analysis. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2023;20:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7
Kelly S, Kaye SA, Oviedo-Trespalacios O. What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telemat Inform. 2023;77:101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925
Chai CS, Wang X, Xu C. An extended theory of planned behavior for modelling Chinese secondary school students’ intention to learn artificial intelligence. Mathematics. 2020;8(11):1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112089
Konukman F, Filiz B, Moghimehfar F, Maghanoy MA, Graber K, Richards KA, et al. Exploring physical education teachers’ intention and perceived constraints in offering online lessons using the theory of planned behavior: A multi-country analysis. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024;14(4):305. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14040305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14040305
El Jireh PB, Villar RT. Gender disparities in cybersecurity awareness, practices, and knowledge: A comparative study of Omani and Filipino university students. In: 2024 2nd International Conference on Computing and Data Analytics (ICCDA). IEEE; 2024. p. 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCDA64887.2024.10867353
Ramirez JP, Obenza DM, Cuarte R. AI trust and attitude toward AI of university students. Int J Multidiscip Stud High Educ. 2024;1(1):22–36. https://doi.org/10.70847/586366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70847/586366
Chan CKY, Lee KK. The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart Learn Environ. 2023;10(1):60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3
Yamada A. Advancing intercultural competence in higher education: Strategies for engaging Generation Z. Educ Sci (Basel). 2025;15(3):341. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030341
Stockemer D. Quantitative methods for the social sciences: A practical introduction with examples in SPSS and Stata. Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 31–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99118-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99118-4
Leedy P, Ormrod J. Practical research: Planning and design. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Merrill Prentice Hall; 2001.
Alieto E, Devanadera A, Buslon J. Women of K-12: Exploring teachers’ cognition in language policy implementation. Asian EFL J. 2020;24(4.1):143–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3588029
Bacang B, Rillo R, Alieto O. The gender construct in the use of rhetorical appeals, hedges and boosters in ESL writing: A discourse analysis. Asian EFL J. 2019;25(52):210–24.
Devanadera A, Alieto O. Lexical bias among Tagalog-speaking Filipino preschool children. Asian EFL J. 2019;24(4):207–28.
Lee A, Alieto E. Analyzing teaching self-efficacy correlates in virtual education: A gender-driven structural equation modeling approach. Malays J ELT Res. 2023;20(2):110–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52696/TCZP6102
Schepman A, Rodway P. Initial validation of the general attitudes toward artificial intelligence scale: Confirmatory validation and associations with personality, corporate distrust, and general trust. Comput Human Behav Rep. 2020;1:100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100014
Kraishan O. Features of applying artificial intelligence in the eighth grade science curriculum in the Sultanate of Oman. J High Educ Theory Pract. 2023;23(9):143–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i9.6140
Venkatesh V, Morris MG. Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Q. 2000;24(1):115–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3250981
Gefen D, Straub DW. Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Q. 1997;21(4):389–400. https://doi.org/10.2307/249720 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249720
Teo T. Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Comput Educ. 2011;57(4):2432–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008
Selwyn N. Minding our language – Why education and technology is full of bullshit … and what might be done about it. Learn Media Technol. 2016;41(3):437–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1012523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1012523
Teo T. Modeling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Comput Educ. 2009;52(2):302–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006
Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1986. p. 23–28.
Rogers EM, Singhal A, Quinlan MM. Diffusion of innovations. In: Donsbach W, editor. An integrated approach to communication theory and research. New York: Routledge; 2014. p. 432–48.
Ng W. Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Comput Educ. 2012;59(3):1065–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Ajzen I. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1980.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jay Rodel C. Serdenia, Alexandhrea Hiedie Dumagay, Keir A. Balasa, Elenieta A. Capacio, Lovelle Diocess S. Lauzon (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
