Tinkercad and mBlock: Tools for Educational Robotics and Coding Learning A Case of Ghandi Primary school Morocco
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62486/latia2025342Keywords:
Educational Robotics, Computational Thinking, STEM EducationAbstract
This study explores the impact of Tinkercad and mBlock on the en gagement and computational thinking skills of students at Ghandi Primary School. Through interactive robotics and coding activities, students demonstrated increased motivation, problem-solving abilities, and confidence in programming. Using Arduino and block-based coding, they developed a deeper understanding of STEM concepts in a hands-on learning environment. The findings suggest that integrating educational robotics into primary education enhances student engage ment and fosters essential 21st-century skills.
References
Chevalier M, Giang C, Piatti A, Mondada F. Fostering computational thinking through educational robotics: A model for creative computational problem solving. Int J STEM Educ. 2020;7:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00238-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00238-z
Eryilmaz S, Deniz G. Effect of Tinkercad on students’ computational thinking skills and perceptions: A case of Ankara province. Turk Online J Educ Technol. 2021;20(1):25–38.
Karabulut Coşkun B, Bozdemir H, Tekkol IA. Investigation of the effects of Tinkercad-based STEM implementations on computational thinking skills and technology use standards of teacher candidates. Kastamonu Educ J. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1195676
Priambodo W, Nugroho K, Hadiono K. Impact of mBlock interface design on student interest and motivation in primary school robotics: A case study in Indonesia. Int J Sci Res Comput Sci Eng. 2023;11(4):1–7. https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrcse/v11i4.17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26438/ijsrcse/v11i4.17
Saez López JM, Sevillano García ML, Vázquez Cano E. The effect of programming on primary school students’ mathematical and scientific understanding: Educational use of mBot. Assoc Educ Commun Technol. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09648-5
Erdogan İ, et al. Examination of the usability of Tinkercad application in educational robotics teaching by eye tracking technique. Smart Learn Environ. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00242-0
Gökçe H, Gökçe Z, Bektaş O, Kırmızıgül AS. Robotic coding perceptions of middle school students: A case study. J Educ Future. 2024;25:31–44. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.1274671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.1274671
Mustafa G, et al. The effects of educational robotics in STEM education: A multilevel meta-analysis. Int J STEM Educ. 2024.
AimsPress Study Group. The use of Tinkercad and 3D printing in interdisciplinary STEAM education. STEAM Educ. 2024;4(3):222–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2024014
Batdi D, Kazu IY, Kurtoglu E. Meta-analysis of educational robotics in STEM. 2022.
Totan HN, Korucu AT. The effect of block-based coding education on students’ computational thinking skills and attitudes: Blocky sample. Particip Educ Res. 2023.
Kurt T, Anılan B. Robotics coding from the perspective of science teachers: a case study of Turkish science teachers. Shanlax Int J Educ. 2024;12(2):79–90. ERIC Document no. EJ1441758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v12iS1-June.7627
Güleryüz H, Dilber R. STEM activities with robotic coding: the effect on awareness of pre-service science teacher candidates for use in science education. Int J Eng Technol Manag Res. 2021;8(11):37–54 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v8.i11.2021.1063
Cano S. A methodological approach to the teaching STEM skills in Latin America through educational robotics for school teachers. Electronics. 2022;11(3):395. doi:10.3390/electronics11030395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11030395
Galeriu C, Letson C, Esper G. An Arduino investigation of the RC circuit. Phys Teach. 2015;53(5):285–288. doi:10.1119/1.4917431Redalyc Study. Introducing robotics and block programming in elementary education. Redalyc J. [Year];[Journal 3314]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4917435
Wanglang C, Saraubon K, Piriyasurawong P. Combining game‑based learning with design thinking using block‑based programming to enhance computational thinking and creative game for primary students. Higher Educ Stud (CCSE). 2022;14(2):137–55. doi:10.5539/hes.v14n2p137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v14n2p137
Chen C‑H, Chung H‑Y. Fostering computational thinking and problem‑solving in programming: Integrating concept maps into robot block‑based programming. J Educ Multimedia Hypermedia. 2024;33(1): ??–??. doi:10.1177/07356331231205052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231205052
Chevalier M, El‑Hamamsy L, Giang C, Bruno B, Mondada F. Teachers’ perspective on fostering computational thinking through educational robotics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.04980. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82544-7_17
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fatimazahra Ouahouda, Khadija Achtaich, Naceur Achtaich (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
