Navigating the Paradox: Climate Change, Cutting-Edge Technologies, and Groundwater Sustainability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62486/latia202583Keywords:
Climate change, Groundwater sustainability, Cutting-edge Technologies, Innovation, Environmental impact, Water management, SustainabilityAbstract
This article explores the paradoxical relationship between climate change, advanced technologies, and groundwater sustainability. It highlights how emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, blockchain, and the Internet of Things (IoT) offer innovative solutions for optimizing groundwater management while addressing climate change impacts. However, the chapter also warns of the environmental risks associated with these technologies, particularly their energy consumption and e-waste generation, which can further exacerbate climate challenges. The chapter examines practical applications such as desalination, precision farming, and water harvesting, evaluating their contributions to groundwater management and their environmental footprints. It argues that the net impact of these technologies depends largely on their design, implementation, and governance frameworks. The research identifies best practices to maximize benefits while minimizing negative environmental consequences. This work addresses key issues of water scarcity and the need for sustainable water supplies in a changing climate. It underscores the importance of fresh water for essential industries, including agriculture, energy production, and mineral processing, while acknowledging the profound effects of climate change and societal shifts on traditional water sources. The chapter also discusses the risks associated with technological investments in water management, such as toxic waste emissions, geopolitical tensions, and corruption. It emphasizes that emissions from these processes contribute significantly to rising atmospheric temperatures and water vapor levels, intensifying climate change. The chapter concludes by advocating for a holistic approach to water management, balancing the costs, benefits, and risks of emerging technologies. It highlights the potential of green engineering advancements and efficient water treatment methods, such as desalination and cleaner urban designs, to sustainably provide fresh groundwater for various uses. The chapter integrates data analytics from engineering and public health performance metrics to establish safe industry targets and calls for responsible governance to ensure technologies contribute positively to both groundwater sustainability and climate change mitigation.
References
Pande CB, Moharir KN, Singh SK, Varade AM. An integrated approach to delineate the groundwater potential zones in Devdari watershed area of Akola district, Maharashtra, Central India. Environ Dev Sustain. 2020;22:4867–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00409-1
Shishaye HA, Tait DR, Befus KM, Maher DT. An integrated approach for aquifer characterization and groundwater productivity evaluation in the Lake Haramaya watershed, Ethiopia. Hydrogeol J. 2019;27(6):2121–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-01956-7
Shekar PR, Mathew A. Assessing groundwater potential zones and artificial recharge sites in the monsoon-fed Murredu river basin, India: An integrated approach using GIS, AHP, and Fuzzy-AHP. Groundw Sustain Dev. 2023;23:100994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2023.100994
Chenini I, Mammou A Ben. Groundwater recharge study in arid region: an approach using GIS techniques and numerical modeling. Comput Geosci. 2010;36(6):801–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2009.06.014
Hosseini SM, Parizi E, Ataie-Ashtiani B, Simmons CT. Assessment of sustainable groundwater resources management using integrated environmental index: Case studies across Iran. Sci Total Environ. 2019;676:792–810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.257
Shuler C, Brewington L, El-Kadi AI. A participatory approach to assessing groundwater recharge under future climate and land-cover scenarios, Tutuila, American Samoa. J Hydrol Reg Stud. 2021;34:100785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100785
Zewdu ZT. Determination of ground water quality of former Lake Haramaya, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. J Ecol Nat Env. 2012;4(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JENE12.009
Rath S, Hinge G. Groundwater sustainability mapping for managed aquifer recharge in Dwarkeswar River basin: Integration of watershed modeling, multi-criteria decision analysis, and constraint mapping. Groundw Sustain Dev. 2024;26:101279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101279
Gebere SB, Alamirew T, Merkel BJ, Melesse AM. Land use and land cover change impact on groundwater recharge: The Case of Lake Haramaya watershed, Ethiopia. Landsc Dyn Soils Hydrol Process Varied Clim. 2016;93–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18787-7_6
Chung I-M, Kim N-W, Lee J, Sophocleous M. Assessing distributed groundwater recharge rate using integrated surface water-groundwater modelling: application to Mihocheon watershed, South Korea. Hydrogeol J. 2010;18(5):1253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-010-0593-1
Holman IP. Climate change impacts on groundwater recharge-uncertainty, shortcomings, and the way forward? Hydrogeol J. 2006;14:637–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-005-0467-0
Addition EV. Framer ’ s Training Manual on Post Harvest Management of Sorghum , Groundnut and Rice.
Panda B, Chidambaram S, Tirumalesh K, Ganesh N, Thivya C, Thilagavathi R, et al. An integrated novel approach to understand the process of groundwater recharge in mountain and riparian zone aquifer system of Tamil Nadu, India. Aquat Geochemistry. 2019;25:137–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10498-019-09357-8
Roy S, Sahu AS. Investigation for potential groundwater recharge area over the Kunur river basin, Eastern India: an integrated approach with geosciences. J Geomatics. 2015;9(2):165–77.
Al Atawneh D, Cartwright N, Bertone E. Climate change and its impact on the projected values of groundwater recharge: A review. J Hydrol. 2021;601:126602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126602
Castillo JLU, Ramos Leal JA, Martínez Cruz DA, Cervantes Martínez A, Marín Celestino AE. Identification of the dominant factors in groundwater recharge process, using multivariate statistical approaches in a semi-arid region. Sustainability. 2021;13(20):11543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011543
Freitas L, Afonso MJ, Pereira AJSC, Delerue-Matos C, Chaminé HI. Assessment of sustainability of groundwater in urban areas (Porto, NW Portugal): a GIS mapping approach to evaluate vulnerability, infiltration and recharge. Environ Earth Sci. 2019;78(5):140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8167-6
Patil VBB, Lokesh KN. Integrated Approach for Groundwater Recharge Assessment—A Review. Groundw Water Qual Hydraul Water Resour Coast Eng. 2022;93–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09551-1_7
Malmir M, Javadi S, Moridi A, Randhir T, Saatsaz M. Integrated groundwater management using a comprehensive conceptual framework. J Hydrol. 2022;605:127363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127363
Mensah JK, Ofosu EA, Yidana SM, Akpoti K, Kabo-bah AT. Integrated modeling of hydrological processes and groundwater recharge based on land use land cover, and climate changes: A systematic review. Environ Adv. 2022;8:100224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100224
Austrheim G, Speed JDM, Martinsen V, Mulder J, Mysterud A. Experimental effects of herbivore density on above-ground plant biomass in an alpine grassland ecosystem. Arctic, Antarct Alp Res. 2014;46(3):535–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-46.3.535
EL-Bana EMM, Alogayell HM, Sheta MH, Abdelfattah M. An Integrated Remote Sensing and GIS-Based Technique for Mapping Groundwater Recharge Zones: A Case Study of SW Riyadh, Central Saudi Arabia. Hydrology. 2024;11(3):38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11030038
Wola AW. Review on the above and below Ground Biomass and Carbon Stock Estimation Options for Trees and Forest Resources: within and around Mago National Park, Southern Region of Ethiopia. South Reg Ethiop 24, 2023). 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4427135
Woldearegay K, Grum B, Hessel R, van Steenbergen F, Fleskens L, Yazew E, et al. Watershed management, groundwater recharge and drought resilience: An integrated approach to adapt to rainfall variability in northern Ethiopia. Int Soil Water Conserv Res. 2024;12(3):663–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.08.009
Umer Y, Chavula P, Abdi E, Ahamad S, Lungu G, Abdula H, et al. Small - Scale Irrigation Farming as a Climate - Smart Agriculture Practice ; Its Adoption and Impact on Food Security for Ethiopian Smallholder Farmers : A Review. 2024;6(1):163–80.
Habowa C, Petros C, Kayusi F. Cultivating Resilience : The Socio- Economic Impact of Homegardens in Kabwe District , Zambia. 2024;6(1):219–35.
Kayusi F, Kasulla S, Malik SJ. Climate Information Services ( CIS ): A Vital Tool for Africa ’ s Climate Resilience. 2024;18(10):108–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2024/v18i10759
Lejissa LT, Wakjira FS, Tanga AA. Effects of Conservation Agriculture and Conventional Tillage on the Soil Physicochemical Properties and Household Income in Southern Ethiopia. Int J Agron. 2022;2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1224193
Mekonnen A. Economic Costs of Climate Change and Climate Finance with a Focus on Africa. 23:50–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/eju012
Yadav BK, Telila FK. Delineating Potential Groundwater Recharge Zones in the Haramaya Watershed of Ethiopia using GIS based Multi-criteria Assessment. main Spons this issue NABARD.
Halperin J, Lemay V, Chidumayo E, Verchot L, Marshall P. Model-based estimation of above-ground biomass in the miombo ecoregion of Zambia. For Ecosyst. 2016;1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-016-0077-4
Mengistu TD, Chung IM, Kim MG, Chang SW, Lee JE. Impacts and Implications of Land Use Land Cover Dynamics on Groundwater Recharge and Surface Runoff in East African Watershed. Water (Switzerland). 2022;14(13). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w14132068
Yeh H-F, Cheng Y-S, Lin H-I, Lee C-H. Mapping groundwater recharge potential zone using a GIS approach in Hualian River, Taiwan. Sustain Environ Res. 2016;26(1):33–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serj.2015.09.005
Srivastava PK, Bhattacharya AK. Groundwater assessment through an integrated approach using remote sensing, GIS and resistivity techniques: a case study from a hard rock terrain. Int J Remote Sens. 2006;27(20):4599–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600554983
Hashemi H, Uvo CB, Berndtsson R. Coupled modeling approach to assess climate change impacts on groundwater recharge and adaptation in arid areas. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2015;19(10):4165–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4165-2015
Pazhuparambil Jayarajan SK, Schneider M, Lakshmanan E. Estimation of natural groundwater recharge in Chennai River basin using multiple approaches. Hydrol Sci J. 2022;67(8):1165–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2022.2064223
Akullo JO, Amayo R, Okello DK, Mohammed A, Muyinda R, Magumba D, et al. Aflatoxin contamination in groundnut and maize food products in Eastern and Northern Uganda. Cogent Food Agric. 2023;9(1):2221015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2023.2221015
Ley A, Haehnel P, Bormann H. Addressing the challenges of climate scenario-based impact studies in modelling groundwater recharge on small barrier islands at the German North Sea coast. J Hydrol Reg Stud. 2023;50:101578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101578
Teferi AB. Groundwater Irrigation Potential Assessment Of The Lake Haramaya Watershed, Oromiya, Eastern Ethiopia. 2021.
Tehakele D. SPATIAL GROUNDWATER RECHARGE ESTIMATION AT SHINILIE WATERSHED, EASTERN CATCHMENT OF AWASH RIVER BASIN. Haramaya University; 2017.
Xie H, Ringler C, Mondal MAH. Solar or Diesel: A Comparison of Costs for Groundwater‐fed Irrigation in Sub‐Saharan Africa under Two Energy Solutions. Earth’s Futur. 2021;9(4):e2020EF001611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001611
Vishwakarma A, Goswami A, Pradhan B. Prioritization of sites for Managed Aquifer Recharge in a semi-arid environment in western India using GIS-Based multicriteria evaluation strategy. Groundw Sustain Dev. 2021;12:100501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100501
Deuteronomy K, Elijah P, Imasiku N. Deforestation impact on ecosystem services in Kamfinsa sub-catchment of Kafue River Basin in Zambia. J Ecol Nat Environ. 2019;11(4):33–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JENE2018.0692
Roy AH, Wenger SJ, Fletcher TD, Walsh CJ, Ladson AR, Shuster WD, et al. Impediments and solutions to sustainable, watershed-scale urban stormwater management: Lessons from Australia and the United States. Environ Manage. 2008;42(2):344–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9119-1
Fierros-González I, López-Feldman A. Farmers’ Perception of Climate Change: A Review of the Literature for Latin America. Front Environ Sci. 2021;9(June):1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.672399
Soori M, Arezoo B, Dastres R. Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in advanced robotics, a review. Cogn Robot. 2023;3:54–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogr.2023.04.001
Bury TM, Sujith RI, Pavithran I, Scheffer M, Lenton TM, Anand M, et al. Deep learning for early warning signals of tipping points. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2021;118(39):e2106140118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2106140118
Sarker IH. Deep learning: a comprehensive overview on techniques, taxonomy, applications and research directions. SN Comput Sci. 2021;2(6):420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00815-1
Karamitrou A, Sturt F, Bogiatzis P, Beresford-Jones D. Towards the use of artificial intelligence deep learning networks for detection of archaeological sites. Surf Topogr Metrol Prop. 2022;10(4):44001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672X/ac9492
Chowdhary CL, Alazab M, Chaudhary A, Hakak S, Gadekallu TR. Computer vision and recognition systems using machine and deep learning approaches: fundamentals, Technologies and Applications. Institution of Engineering and Technology; 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/PBPC042E
Sharma N, Sharma R, Jindal N. Machine learning and deep learning applications-a vision. Glob Transitions Proc. 2021;2(1):24–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gltp.2021.01.004
Ferreira PVR, Paffenroth R, Wyglinski AM, Hackett TM, Bilén SG, Reinhart RC, et al. Multiobjective reinforcement learning for cognitive satellite communications using deep neural network ensembles. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun. 2018;36(5):1030–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2018.2832820
Rasp S, Pritchard MS, Gentine P. Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(39):9684–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810286115
Bui DT, Hoang N-D, Martínez-Álvarez F, Ngo P-TT, Hoa PV, Pham TD, et al. A novel deep learning neural network approach for predicting flash flood susceptibility: A case study at a high frequency tropical storm area. Sci Total Environ. 2020;701:134413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134413
Castiglioni I, Rundo L, Codari M, Di Leo G, Salvatore C, Interlenghi M, et al. AI applications to medical images: From machine learning to deep learning. Phys medica. 2021;83:9–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.006
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Petros Chavula, Fredrick Kayusi, Linety Juma (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
